The evidence is mounting that e-cigarettes help people quit smoking, so why do state and local governments keep banning them or regulating them like tobacco products?
The latest research on the effects of e-cigarette use comes from a study, published in the British Medical Journal, of more than 160,000 Americans over a 14-year period.
“[I]n 2014-15, e-cigarette users in the United States attempted to quit cigarette smoking and succeeded in quitting at higher rates than nonusers,” the study concluded. “This provides the clearest result to date that e-cigarette use is not only associated with a higher smoking cessation rate at the individual user level but also at the population level.”
This comes on the heels of several other respected studies in recent years supporting the use of e-cigarettes as an effective smoking cessation, or nicotine replacement therapy, tool. A study last year from the Royal College of Physicians, a respected British doctors’ group that helps establish medical standards in the country, noted that “the available evidence to date indicates that e-cigarettes are being used almost exclusively as safer alternatives to smoked tobacco, by confirmed smokers who are trying to reduce harm to themselves or others from smoking, or to quit smoking completely,” and found “no evidence” of any significant gateway to smoking among young people.
The report, further, asserted that the long-term health hazards of vaping are “unlikely to exceed 5 percent of the harm from smoking tobacco” — in line with a 2013 study that found that “the levels of potentially toxic compounds in e-cigarette vapor are [nine-fold to] 450-fold lower than those in the smoke from conventional cigarettes.”
Despite this evidence, a package of state anti-smoking bills passed last year included measures to regulate e-cigarettes like smoking by banning vaping from certain public places and raising the minimum age for purchasing e-cigarettes to 21. And the…